Blatant Foreshadowing

I posted on Facebook last night that I hoped to have this blog started up today.  Unfortunately, I am a bit of a perfectionist and found myself searching HTML codes so I could make the site what I really wanted it to be during the final three hours of last night and the previous 5 hours of being home.  I also spent a large part of the time writing a description of my primary vision for this Blog.  I will continue to perfect the site in order to make it more and more appealing, but I thought it only fair to toss in a preliminary taste of something that I plan to hit on at some point in a long and no doubt fun filled journey that will have us all mashing our heads together.

My first piece is a very short snippet of the forward for something I have begun to work on.  It is provocative as promised, and I think through this first tiny article any readers will gain a firmer grasp on the types of ideas I am willing to research and flesh out.  This is a site for cognizance.  Not a site to be spoon fed.  Ideas are very welcome, but expect them to be open to discussion via firing squad.  Defend thoughts with ideas or research, but not with negative banter.  Nobody knows everything, not even the Universe Expert.

Come on in, the water is warm...

Preface

The universe is an immense collection of logic.  Which is not to say that the logic of the universe must incline itself toward the logic of mankind, rather that the factuality of the finite universe as we know it is not bound to the human imaginative capability.  There is no thing truer than to say that many facets concerning the existence of God seem illogical.  The human mind, however, in its finite state cannot be said to possess the capacity to grasp the logic of a being such as God Almighty. Hence we, as humanity, cannot make the ridiculous claim that God's infinite operation and capacity must be confined to a finite set of rules based on human understanding.  I present these seemingly obvious few statements simply because many arguments throughout the religious world seek to incarcerate the power of God in the shackles of fathomable traits and perceived reality. 

It is important to note that since I am a Christian, I obviously believe that God created the earth, and therefore both the physical and supernatural worlds as each currently exists in a very figurative sense.  I will further delve into what I mean by figurative sense of time later in my writing, but the main idea that I wish to present to the world is that God--who cannot be proven to exist or not to exist--should he exist, does not depend on the human ability to prove his existence or non-existence.  In other words, he does not need your or my approval or permission to exist.  He is fully capable and holds the full right to exist whether we want him to, believe he does, or disavow his existence entirely.

Another thing that I should point out at the onset of this writing, however long and involved it may become, is that I do not seek to prove anyone or anything in specific right or wrong.  There may be an intellectual coming-of-age of sorts in my own mind as I study and search for truths.  My intent in plotting my journey, sharing my research and including my deductions is to show that the Christian must not necessarily be pitted against science as has been the common course since the "Dark Ages."  The basis of my writing is to open doors to new idealogical principles that have never even been seriously discussed before due to Christian ideas being cast aside as naive, or scientists who were afraid of being called Bible Thumpers and losing professional credibility.  I have nothing on either of these fronts to lose, and the world has everything to gain by setting a collision course to what I believe to be the truth: Science and God do not have to be enemies.  They are, in fact, eternally intertwined.